Issues with Combining Sequences Using Clojure

I was working my way through the Elyses Destructured Enchantments exercise in the Clojure track of the excellent Exercism training site and it really expanded my knowledge of sequential destructuring It's very cool, understanding the basics of that makes it much easier pass around sequences and understand other people's code.

One side effect of working on this exercise was learning about combining sequences (i.e vectors, lists, and ordered sets). There are tons and tons of functions available in the standard library that do something like this and I had quite a bit of difficulty finding one that worked for this scenario.

All I had to do was combine one or more numbers with a vector of strings. Should be easy right? Well, here's what I tried:

user> (def strings ["one" "two" "three"])
;; => #'user/strings
user> (concat 9 strings)
Error printing return value (IllegalArgumentException) at clojure.lang.RT/seqFrom (
Don't know how to create ISeq from: java.lang.Long
user> (concat [9 strings])
;; => (9 ["one" "two" "three"])
user> [9 strings]
;; => [9 ["one" "two" "three"]]
user> (conj 9 strings)
Execution error (ClassCastException) at user/eval13467 (form-init5656966070595896937.clj:47).
class java.lang.Long cannot be cast to class clojure.lang.IPersistentCollection (java.lang.Long is in module java.base of loader 'bootstrap'; clojure.lang.IPersistentCollection is in unnamed module of loader 'app')
user> (conj [9 strings])
;; => [9 ["one" "two" "three"]]

Now take those lines, multiply it by 20 and add 5 or 6 other functions that seem to be able to do what I want and you'll begin to appreciate my frustration ๐Ÿ˜  Some functions kindof worked (like into) but they didn't give me the ability control where I placed the number.

And of course, the most frustrating part is that this is supposed to be easy. I'm sure I could write something requiring 3 or 4 functions to do this but manipulating lists is Clojure's bread and butter - there was certainly a very simple, idiomatic solution that I was missing.

In the end I finally broke down and started Googling for other people's solutions and found the "magic function": flatten:

(flatten [9 strings])
;; => (9 "one" "two" "three")

Oh well, I'm glad I finally found this, and I'm assuming that I'll be using it a lot in the future.